RESEARCH AND ART implementation in Visual ART
Abstract
The study of art world requires approaches from various disciplines are linked, because the world of art is intrinsically shows a broad perception content and complexity of the problem. As a necessity of life, now art has penetrated into various fields of life, and becomes a need as important as other needs. Research on art works and aspects related to it requires a methodical scientific approach to interdisciplinary study. This paper will elaborate on how the paradigmatic implications and its implementation in the study of art from these interdisciplinary studies.
1. Introduction
Understanding of art, particularly art, which only relies on one's perspective seems to have felt a lot of people did not satisfactory. Fine art is now not merely seen as a work of art, human expression is associated with lines, colors, and fields, as well as aesthetic principles alone, but as proposed by a historian, Yudoseputro (2000: v-vi) that "essentially the art world is basically content showed a broad perception that reflects the identity that is not a single profile so that every answer of the problem which led to a variety of substances hook-mengkait". Furthermore, dikemukakannya that especially in the study of art in Indonesia with the community and diverse culture, has now felt how necessary openness of the various disciplines; contemporary art discourse always expect a solution based on a thorough knowledge of culture, intact, and depth.
On the other hand, attention to contemporary art seem more open and widespread, and no longer monopolized only by institutions that conventionally higher education in the field of visual arts course. Attention to fine art as a matter of research in scientific disciplines, such as anthropology, sociology, psychology, and history is growing. Studies conducted in various fields of science, of course, is paradigmatic done by using theories, concepts, and methods that are typically become conventions in the relevant field of science in mind, namely an approach that is monodisipliner; that because it is monolithic nature. In addition to pure research conducted by scientists who pay attention to issues of art, some study done for the sake of writing a thesis (S1), thesis (S2), even (S3) (see: Havet, 1978; Gray and Pirie, 1996 ).
Higher education institutions in the Indonesian art, which is seeking its form as a professional educational institutions and academic, has sought to strengthen the science of art start (science of art) as a vehicle for formulating a new paradigm of flexible, supple, berasas cross-sectoral, and multidisciplinary . The need to formulate a new paradigm is very urgent, especially after the establishment of educational programs stratum 2 (S2) and stratum 3 (S3) program specific art and design at leading institutions in Indonesia, such as Master and Doctoral Program in Art and Design at the Institute Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Performing Arts Studies Program at the University of Gadjah Mada (UGM), and this year opened a course in Art Creation Institut Seni Indonesia (ISI) Yogyakarta. Certainly, too, this also becomes the demand for the universities (which had IKIP) in the opening program S1, nonkependidikan Arts Program (pure).
This paper tries to present a discussion of interdisciplinary studies, paradigmatic implications, and its implementation in art research. This paper is expected to also be an alternative answer in an attempt to confirm the field of visual arts as a discipline that has a body of knowledge of his own. To discuss this issue with a more fundamental then the inevitable to explain the basis for his thinking, by way of tracing and placing art in the framework of the development of science-knowledge in general. Then, as he considered logical reasons, tried to discuss the fact ontological and epistemological paradigm for the study of art, as an interdisciplinary study.
2. Platform Thought: Development of Science
Starting from the mind of Copernicus, and continued with Galileo Galilei to Newton, - who insists that the earth around the sun on its axis -, the revolutionary view that greater emphasis on scientific objectivity has been knocked out empirikal mystical view of the universe that previously held.
Approach that emphasizes the mind is a better place again in the view that echoes Descartes' cogito ergo sum. Emerges then a view that relies on the power of consciousness and the human mind, the formulas must be strict in solving a variety of natural phenomena which the human face (Lavine, 1984; 125; Mahoney and Lyddon, 1988: 192).
This view is emphasized by the positive rationalistic thoughts of Auguste Comte, who has a very large role in the history and development of modern science, whose influence is very strong so far (see eg, van Peurseun, 1985). Comte argued that development should be directed to the advancement of significance for him positively.
Comte's view that affirm a line of development towards progress, not only applies to the historical process of human life, but also in the process of development of the human soul and the individual as a whole. Development connotes consolidate the progress it has a sense of optimism or a myth that has arisen since the time of Aufklaerung about mankind's future is bright. Thanks to the philosophical positivism born models of science that 'positive' laws and their common and declared valid to all things, apart from the speculative load (see: Wibisono, 1982).
Basic beliefs are rooted in positivism 'ontological reality', the guidelines used to answer questions about the nature of reality and how to explain that something that in fact working. The point, namely that beyond the humanitarian aspects existing in humans, there is a reality (with different dynamics) is driven by the laws of nature, standing alone, the existence and dynamics were not for human intervention. Thus, science activities, according to this view, in fact, is to find the truth and the nature of reality to explain how the actual truth of nature or laws that work.
A number of scientists from the disciplines of science and physics from the University of Vienna trying to develop a view called 'neopositivisme' or 'logical positivism'. This view is strongly influenced by Auguste Comte's view of the positive nature of knowledge. Circle of Vienna tried to unify the diversity of science with language and the workings of the natural sciences. The unification of the so-called science of integrated (unified science or einheitswissenschaft). Integrated science was described in neopositivisme view the contents of which affirm that: (1) only one source of experience, the experience that comes from senses, (2) the logical and mathematical propositions are useful for the processing of sensory data, (3) or line of demarcation boundary between meaningful statements (meaningfull) the statement is meaningless (meaningless), (4) reject metaphysical statements expressed with language that is not meaningful, and (5) philosophy of science is seen as the science of logic (the logic of science).
Although several subsequent generations of thinkers (see, eg, Karl Popper, 1959) to criticize neopositivisme view, but the undeniable impact of formal logic view is very strong on the development of science in general.
Thus, the various disciplines of knowledge belonging to the science-natural science ontology adhere strictly to that fact. Science-natural science, ultimately, be a reference for the science-social science and humanities in the context of confession "keilmiahannya". Even for decades, as has been pointed out above, science, natural science (science) is not only a reference to determine criteria for scholarship, but also dominating feature ontology of science-social science and humanities.
Leksono-Supeli (2000: 31) asserted that the transition to the 20th century was marked by positivism reached the top of the monopoly of interpretation of reality. Times were methods of natural science kemutlakannya recognized. Sainstisme-which is now obsolete (bottom line of the author) - to spread ideas about scientific beliefs to himself. This means that we understand it is not enough natural science as one form of knowledge that may, but need to identify all the knowledge in the natural sciences. The method of science that all science must be guided to success for the benefit of mankind can be guaranteed. The world needs an integrated science.
However, in recent decades, Thomas S. Kuhn (1962 and 1970) had opposed the ontology of science-natural science - the opposition is widespread support from scientists, especially social knowledge. He said that the development of science does not occur gradually (evolution) based on the results of the discovery of natural laws, but through a 'revolution' or the rapid changes and paradigm-a fundamental paradigm. "When paradigms change, the world is also changing with", such assertion.
The first of Kuhn's ideas is he tends to put science in a historical context. He said, the advance of science is revolutionary. Therefore, in the history will appear in a new perspective that grew into 'new vision' is called a paradigm. Thus, ditegaskannya that the incidence of 'new paradigm' because of the historical process. He said that:
Led by a new paradigm, scientists adopt new instruments, and look in new places. Even more important, during revolutions scientists see new and different things when looking with familiar instruments in places they have looked before ... Nevertheless, paradigm changes do cause scientists to see the world of their research-engagement differently. In so far their only recourse to that world is through what they see and do, we may want to say that after a revolution scientists are responding to a different world (Kuhn, 1970: 111).
Unlike the laws of nature is in fact natural, 'paradigm' or a fundamental point of view that it was in self-researchers or scientists themselves. Thus, the 'existence' and 'validity' natural law does not depend on the facts of nature, but rather depends on the 'paradigm' is owned by the researcher or scientist concerned.
In this regard great works in science read, appreciated, criticized, shaken, or praised, because one of the main soul is paradigm. Moreover, if the paradigm that brings something new, so-called new paradigm that could improve, remodel, move, add, or make a revolution for the 'old paradigm' which has been in power. Thus, the natural laws of nature antargejala relationship becomes present again, if there is a new paradigm that produces a natural law that is more perfect to describe the nature of the relationship between the symptoms of the same nature which had gone before.
The second idea, of Kuhn, is the existence of historical cycles in the development of science. Historical cycle that goes through four stages, namely:
(1) pre-paradigm stage; in this stage will appear heuristics, namely how to find something new in science activities.
(2) paradigmatic phase, ie stage when the paradigm guiding scientific activity in normal science (real science); in other words, paradigmatic stage shows that run in a normal science.
(3) phase of crisis, namely the crisis in science. Scientists find some difficulty in carrying out his research and found a variety of symptoms that can not be explained by the theory. That's called 'anomalies'.
(4) Phase scientific revolution, when scientists began to question again the paradigm that has been worn it; with so scientists have been out of normal science. To overcome the crisis can be re-scientists at scientific activities with a rival paradigm that can solve both problems and subsequent research.
2. Characterization of Sciences
Scientific Revolution by Thomas Kuhn has encouraged the efforts of philosophers of science to see the back of ontology, epistemology, and methodology applicable in science, particularly on links between science, natural sciences (natural sciences) with the social sciences and humanity (human sciences). The fundamental difference between the two study groups were due to differences in the paradigms of each science is.
Science-natural science departs from the paradigm that underlies pengkajiannnya goal of 'natural phenomena' as an attempt to discover or uncover the laws that are the essence of the relationships between natural phenomena such. The goal is solving the problem of the 'puzzle' that is embodied in, and from, the relationships between natural phenomena under study. Object, in this case, shown by category numbers, space, time, and mass.
On the other hand, human sciences paradigm stems from the underlying objective assessment of the 'human phenomena' as an attempt to understand human behavior and expression, and therefore the design of the interpretive or hermeneutic. The basis of thinking is that humans are basically the object of study is a creature that thinks, feels, and can interpret themselves and their environment, and therefore also called the subject (see: Suparlan, 1999: 20).
Characterization of polarization as described above, the problem seems too simplistic, because it has been ignored is the fact that continuum, and especially the influence of science, natural science of the human sciences that have occurred so far, especially against a group of science-social science.
Science, in line kontinumnya, conventionally categorized into three groups, namely science, natural science at one end, and humanities (humanities) at the other end, was in the midst of the science-social science (social sciences) . Kubu science is fundamentally bersetentang between science, natural science with the humanities, because it seems each group has a paradigm that can not be reconciled. Being in the middle of the continuum line is the science-social science.
On the one hand knowledge of the social sciences have features that try to be like science, natural science, and therefore the character of positivistic. With positivitik view of social phenomena and humanity are treated the same as natural phenomena. Starting from the view that the methods used and studies produced by social sciences, aims to discover the laws that generally applicable objective (universal). In addition, the research techniques used are measurements, and therefore the resulting theory is a form of trends. Studies such as this, in the social sciences known as the study of the use and develop 'quantitative approach' (see: Suparlan, 1999: 21).
On the other hand, in science, social science is also growing steadily 'qualitative approach' that is interpretive, as it exists in the paradigm of the humanities. The emphasis of this qualitative approach is on understanding (verstehen or understanding). The emphasis of this approach is more emphasis on the everyday experiences as study material by applying the reception, expression, and understanding. In a qualitative approach, there are no restrictions on the experience of the experimental conditions as in the controlled observation of natural science.
In the history of science so far, a quantitative approach that has dominated positivistic science, social science, and only in the last decade, qualitative interpretive approach indicates its existence as a methodology, and even as a new paradigm called constructivism (constructivism) and pascapositivisme ( post-positivism) (see eg Miles and Huberman 1994; Denzin and Lincoln, 1994).
4. Paradigm in Science
Each group was divided again science in disciplines different. In general can be mentioned among others, physics, biology, chemistry and sciences that empirical Eg non-human objects are classified into the sciences of nature, psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science and communications, classified into sciences social knowledge, while the history, philosophy, and art can be classified into the cultural sciences or humanities.
Differences of each scientific discipline is also
caused by fundamental differences in the paradigm. Paradigm in each discipline of science that is supported by theoretical tools and concepts, methodologies or approaches and methods used in scientific activities (Suparlan, 1999: 23). Thus, the key concepts used in science pembidangan, as well as in the classification of knowledge, is the paradigm.
In general terms, a paradigm is understood as a model to be followed or imitated. Paradigm can also be interpreted as an underlying belief or point of view how to view and symptoms meperlakukan targeted studies included in the scope of issues of concern. Kuhn (1970) asserted that the paradigm be a reference to a specific scientific Komuniti, whose contents are the rules, methodologies, and theories that must be followed, the instruments should be used, the issues become the focus of the study, and assessment standards of research activities.
Paradigm can be viewed as a system of theories, methods, and fundamental approaches and / or affect the way of thinking, world views, and how to do something. He is a belief system embodied in a model of theory, concepts, and methodologies agreed upon, and is used by a group of people to solve various problems encountered in the system of natural science and social science. Paradigm of the essential positions, especially when viewed as a cluster of systems, theories, concepts, methods, and approaches that underlie and guide the direction of the attitude of doing or put something; ie something to be chosen with an attitude and a commitment to develop science and build human .
In the context of a society, can mean a paradigm of unity concept, values, perception, and praxis that is shared by a community, who form the view of reality, and became the basis for community residents concerned to govern themselves. Thus can be asserted, that the scientific community in the context of the paradigm is a scientific belief, which is the point of view of scientific citizen, in order to understand and treat the symptoms, research activities, or the study, and to assess the validity of research activities and its results .
Particularly in the disciplines of social science, which is a product of the paradigm of positivism and hermeneutics, not only use just a single paradigm but has many paradigm (multiparadigm). Each discipline in the social sciences, such as anthropology, sociology, or psychology, has the following scientific world of concepts, theories, methodologies, or approaches that each different from one another. Similarly, even, the same one any discipline, such as anthropology, may have a different paradigm: for example, the paradigm of cultural materialism of Marvin Harris paradigm is different from cultural relativism (which interpretive) of Clifford Geertz (see: Suparlan, 1999: 22) .
5. Visual Art as a Target of Study
In the ontological view we always face the arts, in this case more specifically the visual arts, as an integral part of human life. We can conclude that the need for aesthetic expression, universally, is closely related to the fundamental characteristics of human presence. No society that we know that culture does not accommodate the presence of art. Leang Cave-leang in Sulawesi and the Lascaux Cave in France to be one proof that art faithful present and assist human life since the beginning of life. No matter how simple human life, no one ignores the need for aesthetic expression. Another fact also shows that the ways that needs are culturally determined, consistent with its functions in a broad scope, which is integrated with many aspects of culture eat it.
Ontology biological facts can also be raised in line with the known function of the human brain that enables the association of language and emotion or vision and hearing with emotion, so that they can understand how deep emotions can be transferred into the great works of art; one of them in the form of works of art (see eg Pope, 1984).
From a biological point it is clear that certain human behavior in the minds of the lateral location. This affirmation is intended to better understand human expression in the works, and works of art forms, not merely by looking at the cultural reality, as the values, knowledge, beliefs, rules, and ways of behaving, but to appreciate " fruit wine or a delicious meal by knowing the ingredients ".
Noerhadi (1999: IV) explained that if the arts (fine art / pen. /) Is returned on several functions and criteria of a work, first of all can be traced mimetic function and catharsis. The first is the attempt to display a picture or a reflection of reality and the second is the purification of the soul through the channeling of emotions. When two thousand years later revealed the expression of function-expression of the deepest and darkest recesses of the human personality-orientation is in the scope of human romance. Both the reality and the human as a person, both of them, appear in a synthesis that was possible because of religious elan, the relationship between human faith in the supernatural reality as a theme in art. Then at the beginning of this century art as an autonomous unit or form meaningful (significant form) dominates the theory of art. Finally the art as a whole is precisely that is ready for the experience and the further deconstruction of art also appears in the pseudo-dimension (virtuality) as proposed Suzanne K. Langer, or simularcum (as a hyper-reality) in Baudrillard's view, or even replace the reality of construction symptoms .
No exaggeration to say that art is born with human beings with passion and dignity of all humanity. He can be born because koevolusi biobudaya, who had walked for centuries. Now, it can be affirmed that art was born as a biological demands. That is, the biological work of art is born because of the biological function of available system that supports the manifestation. However, its biological functions are certainly influenced by the culture. However people thought he was a biological creature, can not be denied that he lived in the cultural sphere. He communicates with the language, active art, or technology, even almost the entire neighborhood to be meaningful for human processing.
Cultural domination, or at least the influence of cultural values on the development of art can not be avoided, even he can inspire and enrich the style of works of art forms at all times. Therefore also, plastic arts and arts in general, not just the symbols that express emotions and ideas of the beauty of individuals, but it can serve as a reference (reference), or even the core of what is revealed.
Thus, can be summarized an understanding that art is a "space" for the discourse in which dwells the "mind and a sense of" creating a cultural configuration. About the mind and a sense of an abstract nature that can be individual discourse, the discourse of individuals as members of society, or the entire members of the public discourse as a kolektiva (see: Melalatoa, 1999).
The results of research in the field (see: Allison Research Index of Art & Design, 1992 in the Carole and Pirie, 1996: Havet, 1978; Rohidi, 1993 and 1999) show that there are two kinds of symptoms that come into contact with art. First, there are "symptoms of visual art" which can be observed as a product, but kolektivanya stated that it is not art or sell art works; he is not the expression of the desire for beauty. "Symptoms of visual art" is more a space ride for the mortuary beliefs, knowledge, or values. Second, knowledge, beliefs, or values to be loads of art work of nuanced beauty, which by kolektivanya also felt and recognized as a form of art expression, or beauty.
In this perspective filosuf, scientists, or researchers also participated limits of "art signs" are observed. In ancient Greek art is seen as a technique. Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus view art as an illusion and imitation. Fine art is also seen as a beauty (Ghoete, Kant, Winckelman); games (Schiller, Huizinga, Groos); expression (Tolstoy, Veron); imagination, intuition (Croce, Bergson); desire (Nithszche, Frued); or pleasure (Santayana ). Fine art is also considered only as a matter of form by Bell and Berg. Reid and more see it as Bosanquet function, abstraction, aesthetic distance, or incarnation, while Susanne K. Langer and Ernst Cassirer saw it as a symbol (see: Khoiri, 2000; Sahman, 1995).
The study above shows an ontological fact that art as part of a comprehensive art, which became part of human life both individually (including biological), social, or cultural, to show universality in one sense and pluraritasnya on the other side. Normatively also can be shown - that the discussion is to be supporting or driving the - art as a target of scientific studies with a strong empirical foundation.
6. Art Research in interdisciplinary studies
Symptoms are defined as fine art, either by themselves or by kolektivanya scientist or researcher, in essence pointing in two directions. The first direction refers to objects, or works of art, a form of expression, which is commonly referred to as intraestetik factor; the second refers to the content, background, values, knowledge, and beliefs, as well as the environment that helped paint the realization that art works , commonly referred to as ekstraestetik factor.
Fine art is a complex phenomenon, which requires the study of various disciplines of knowledge. Studies toward requiring a more fundamental theory, which allows the results of studies from various disciplines can be seated. Although various theories presented in a variety of disciplines, but still needed a metatheory which also tested to be robust insights that can make room for all the studies and research to date. Metatheory is a frame of reference is called a paradigm, which is a device characteristic beliefs and preconceptions, which includes a shared commitment in the implementation of the instrumental, theoretical, and metaphysical (see: Kuhn, 1970: 17 and 39-42). Which then needs to be emphasized is that this paradigm applies to a society with certain limits, the scientific community (Kuhn, 1977: 294-295). In this case the community of scientists in the field of visual arts.
Aware of it, strongly felt the importance of constructing a research and testing procedures to be used in methodological research developed art in the direction of increasingly complex. Development or the development of art research procedure appears to the fore in line with developments in other disciplines, such as in social science that offers a number of alternative paradigms in research, and philosophy of science that moves from position to position Newtonian to the complex.
In particular, procedures relating to this art research, methodology and research methods are conducted not covered from the fields of natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Procedures should responsive, to solve problems or deal with the challenges faced by the discipline of art. This is where the importance of why we should re-examine and test the procedures and practices, and in which the feasibility, its use in research. The use of an inappropriate procedure may undermine the credibility of the research steps, and do not deserve to be continued.
Assessment Gray and Pirie (1996) asserts that the study of art is not exclusive, otherwise he has even presented a characteristic eclecticism, multimetode adoption, approach to the acquisition of information, selection, structuring, analysis, evaluation, presentation, and communication. Echoes of the synthesis procedure, in fact, appear also in social science research today. Peramuan exploration and limitations of the methodologies that individual is very helpful in developing new research praxis is more promising.
The question is how different paradigms may be one, or how could a new paradigm as a revolution can co-exist with the old paradigm? Can, compiled a metatheory that can be used as methodological basis, to question the validity of knowledge about art?
In essence, combining two or more scientific disciplines into one, which can create a new methodology, it is possible as long as relevant presence in the context of the scope of the study issues. Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approach is the answer to the question on how best to define the problems the study and in obtaining valid data. Is not art as a matter of the study showed himself as a problem that has traditionally been outside the study, which is usually a concern of a particular discipline, and vice versa, as well art is also a symptom of a problem-assessment - which is usually a concern of many disciplines knowledge.
In other words, for art as a matter of attention has compiled a pattern that approaches or methodologies vary, it would require an approach that is interdisciplinary. This requires the concept of references and an integrated theory that made a reconstruction memungknkan deductively, so that the relationships clearly between theories that can be used as reference methodology. Therefore, a paradigm of interdisciplinary studies and the methodology itself, which is not the same as that used in the scientific disciplines of the parent.
Interdisciplinary approach can be realized as a research activity, as a course or field of teaching, or as a program of study. Study of fields are usually designed to understand or measure a problem of study beyond the traditional study of a scientific discipline, which is in accordance with its use. Study antardisplin produce theories that are relevant and useful, comprehensive solutions to the problems of the target study, which may not be generated by the study of scientific discipline to study the same problem. If the interdisciplinary study is not in accordance with the expected keguanaan, then the study will be abandoned or the results of these studies will not be used.
Selection interdisciplinary study as the study of art is not solely because besifat theoretical reasons, but because emprik and practical reasons (for this compare with multidisciplinary study *). Implementation of education in educational institutions of fine art or fine arts courses, more specifically in Indonesia, seems more interdisciplinary print. This is evident in the curricula of institutions, which are interdisciplinary, which either explicitly or implicitly appear in the field of teaching or courses organized and conducted. Courses are given, most, is the theoretical formula is taken from various scientific disciplines-in a name specific courses, which are typically taught to provide insight into the antardisipliner art and became the basis for creating works. To this can be seen in the curriculum or the institution of standardized national curriculum today.
In addition, it can also be argued that experts in the field of visual arts, in educational institutions we, the scientific activities often use a number of concepts and / or theories from disciplines other sciences; for example, 'aesthetic', history, anthropology, psychology, sociology, and even recently from the field of political science. Consideration of the use of concepts and / or theories from other disciplines is because it is considered useful or relevant in the effort to understand the issues that are complex kesenirupaan.
The takeover of the concept and / or theories from disciplines other knowledge, arranged in a single system of thought in the form of a model unit of measurement theory or explanation of the guide or methodological basis in the conduct of research, thoroughly transformed and can be interpreted as a body of knowledge study of interdisciplinary in the field of art, ie a form of art studies with a new paradigm.
Reading List
Cassirer, Ernst. 1987. Human and Culture. Translation: Alois A. Nugroho. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Denzin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. California: Sage Publications, Inc..
Gray, Carole and Ian Pirie. 1996. 'Artistic' Research Procedures Research at theEdge of Chaos?. Aberdeen: The Robert Gordon University.
Havet, Jacques. 1978. Mian Trends of Research in the Sciences of Art: Legal Science, Philosophy. Volume Volume IA and IB. Paris: Mouton Publishers / Unesco-The Hague.
Khoiri. Inspiration. 2000. Concept Works. BC Cources task. Studio 614 I. Bandung: Master's Degree Program in Art and Design ITB.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press (2nd printing).
-------------------. 1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Lavine, T. 1984. From Socrates to Satre: The Philosophy of Quest. New York: BANTAN Books.
Leksono-Supeli, Karlina. 2000. A War for fascination. In: Kompas, June 2, 2000, pp. 31.
Mahoney, M. and W. Lyddon. 1988. Rescent Developments in Cognitive Approaches to Counseling & Psychotherapy. In: The Counseling Psychologist 16. No. 2 pp. 190-234.
Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: Source Book of New Methods. Translation: Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI Press.
Noerhadi, Toeti Heraty. Recognizing the crisis on the Self Portrait of the Other. Paper Presented in Seminar on Anthropology in order to Jubelium-30 Journal of Anthropology Indonesia. Depok, May 8, 1999.
Pope, Geoffrey. 1984. Biological Anthropology. Jakarta: CV. Eagle.
Rohidi, Tjetjep Rohendi. 2000. Art in the Cultural Approach. Bandung: STISI Press.
-------------------------------. 2000. Problem Analysis and Research Objectives in
Master Program (Visual arts specialization): The Development of Subject Qualitative Research Methodology in the Field of Art and Design Program S2 and S3 ITB. Report to the Community Service Activities (Not published). Bandung: LPM ITB.
-------------------------------. 1993. Art Expression of the Poor: Symbolic Adaptation to Poverty. Dissertation (Not published). Jakarta / Depok: Anthropology Doctoral Program, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of Indonesia.
Sahman, Humar. 1995. Aesthetics: A Critical Review. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.
Suparlan, Parsudi. 1999. Inter-Area Studies of Science. In: Bulletin of Japanese Studies. No. 9/Tahun 3, December 1999 (Fuyu-ban), pp. 17 to 29.
Van Peursen, C.A. 1985. Composition of Science: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Translation: J. Drost. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.
Wibisono, Koento. 1983. Meaning of development according to the philosophy of positivism. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.
Yudoseputro, Wiyoso. 2000. Preface. In: Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. "Art in the Cultural Approach". Bandung: STISI Press.
Author Biography:
Prof. Dr. Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi, MA, Professor of Cultural Anthropology UNNES (Semarang State University), S1 graduate Education Department of Fine Arts (IKIP Bandung, now UPI), Master Program (S2) Anthropology and Cultural Anthropology Doctoral Program University of Indonesia. Now he works as Head of the High School of Art and Design (STISI) Bandung, professor of Master and Doctoral Programs Art ITB, and UI professor of the Graduate School. In addition to working as a researcher cultural issues, he also actively writing various articles / papers for the mass media and seminars.
Read More..